Scottish Surname Surprises

When “Mc” Doesn’t Stay Put

If you’ve researched Scottish ancestors for any length of time, you’ve probably discovered that surnames don’t always behave the way we expect. Just when you think you’ve searched every possible spelling, another variation appears—and sometimes it’s one you never would have imagined.

One recent project involved a man named John McPhee. It seemed straightforward enough. I searched for McPhee, MacPhee, and even Mc Phee with a space. I tried alternate spellings, different search strategies, and every variation I could think of.

Still, the record refused to appear.

Then I stopped assuming the index would organize the name the way I expected.

Instead of finding:

McPhee, John

I found:

Phee Mc, John

At first glance, I assumed it had to be an error. It wasn’t.

Some historical indexes treated Mc and Mac as prefixes rather than part of the surname itself. Instead of filing the record under M, the surname appeared under P for Phee. Unless you know that filing convention exists, it’s easy to search for hours without ever thinking to look under a completely different letter.

Scottish surnames present other surprises as well. Depending on the record and the person creating it, the same family might appear as McPhee, Mc Phee, MacPhee, McFee, or even phonetic variations such as McFea or Phea. None of those versions is necessarily wrong. They simply reflect different clerks, different spelling conventions, accents, and record-keeping practices over time.

Once I understood how the name had been filed, the record appeared almost immediately.

The breakthrough didn’t come from another search.

It came from changing my expectations.

Historical records weren’t created for modern databases. Understanding how names were recorded—and sometimes how they were filed—can make the difference between a frustrating dead end and a successful discovery.

Following the evidence sometimes means following the record keeper’s logic instead of our own.

---